Six differences between now and last time Nasdaq was at 5,000

The market isn’t as frothy as it was in 2000, but it’s very expensive


Though the NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC)  has finally clawed its way back to the 5,000 level it hit at the top the Internet bubble in March 2000, it’s nowhere nearly as overvalued today as it was then — 15 years ago.

Is that good news?

The bulls certainly think so. In fact, however, comparing the current market to the top of the Internet bubble is damning with faint praise. Today’s market is still more overvalued than it was at the vast majority of bull-market peaks of the last century.

It’s indicative of the current market euphoria that many bulls are focusing only on the comparison to March 2000 and conveniently ignoring the rest of history.

Before reviewing the inconvenient truths that this history presents, however, I’ll start with the comparison to March 2000, according to six widely followed valuation measures:

Price/earnings ratio: Based on trailing 12-month earnings, the S&P 500‘s P/E ratio stood at 29.0 at the top of the Internet bubble, versus 20.5 today.

Cyclically-adjusted P/E ratio, or CAPE: This stood at 43.8 in March 2000, versus 27.8 today.

Price/Sales ratio: At the top of the Internet bubble, this ratio got up to 2.1—versus 1.8 today.

Price/Book ratio: This ratio is 2.8 today, in contrast to 4.8 in March 2000.

Dividend yield: The S&P 500’s fell to 1.2% at the top of the Internet bubble; it’s 2.0% today.

q-ratio, an indicator that was championed by the late James Tobin, the 1981 Nobel laureate in economics, calculated by dividing market cap by the replacement cost of assets. Based on data compiled by Stephen Wright, an economics professor at the University of London, and Andrew Smithers, founder of the U.K.-based economics-consulting firm Smithers & Co., I estimate that this ratio currently stands at 1.13, versus 1.64 at the top of the Internet bubble.

In other words, if you use the March 2000 market top as your standard for judging whether equities are overvalued, the current stock market still has a long way to run.

The overwhelming reason to not use March 2000 top as your standard of market valuation: According to most valuation measures, that month’s market top represented the most extreme overvaluation in U.S. history. A far different picture emerges if we instead compare the current market to its valuation at past bull-market peaks.


Click here to inquire about subscriptions to the Hulbert Sentiment Indexes.

Mark Hulbert has been tracking the advice of more than 160 financial newsletters since 1980. Subscribe now to Mark’s premium newsletters and get 30 days free.

More From MarketWatch

  • When firing your financial adviser is best for your retirement
  • How Instagram may have gotten this Republican in hot water
  • Is OPEC ready to announce an output cut?

You may also like...

Rules of Discussion on Six differences between now and last time Nasdaq was at 5,000

1. This forum is for discussion of financial markets. Please respect others view even if they are contrary to you.
2. Member's comments should lead to value addition in forum discussion.
3. If anyone is found making repetitive Explicit/Abusive/Racial comments, his account shall be banned and old posts will be deleted.
4. Providing Advice/Recommendations/Tips is fine but it should be free. Members cannot ask to be paid for it. Paid Advice is strictly prohibited
5. Spam links are not allowed. Too much promotion or using Contact info in ID will lead to account ban.
IMP : Members are requested to flag any violations to keep Forum Clean.
Loading comments …